About Me

Name: Pete Zimmerman
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

America Needs A Reality Shot, not a Booster Shot

Now that President Bush has signed into law the infamous Stimulus Package that will send checks to Middle and Lower income families, it becomes clear that about 43% of taxpayers will be paying off debt with the money, a recent survey by the International Council of Shopping Centers confirms.

Now how is this fair?  In essence I am paying off that debt through the taxes I pay to the U.S. government.  What kind of Socialist society are we becoming?  Why should our tax money be redistributed for others to spend or pay off debt?  This plan has made it clear of the direction our society is heading, as both Democrats and Republicans buy votes by redistributing wealth, with nobody even interested in stopping them.

It is unseemly for a democratic government to take this approach.  But our elected representatives don’t care what I think or those like me; it’s too close to election time for them to even think twice about voting against this.  The only question and argument on their mind is how much they can get President Bush, once perceived as a conservative president, to sign off on before the checks go out!  The vote was 81 to 16 in the Senate and 380 to 34 in the House of Representatives.  You don’t get more lopsided than that!

It is the height of fiscal irresponsibility to agree to this plan.  Instead of addressing the root cause of the problems that got us into this situation to begin with, they are now going to throw a band-aid on it so that they can say they did something to help.

The Stimulus Package does more to hurt than to help.  It adds to the budget deficit, redistributes income, and does nothing to address the behavior of financial institutions that caused this mess to begin with.

Let’s think about it for a minute.  The real problem here is that financial institutions have been going crazy lending money to people that cannot afford to pay them back, period.  The sub-prime mortgage crisis is all about banks lending money at high interest rates to risky borrowers, and then they resold these mortgages on the open market.  These same financial institutions lent money through their credit card businesses to folks of questionable credit-worthiness.  Banking 101 tells us not to lend money to people that cannot pay you back.

So now the U.S. and world economy face a financial mess brought about by these poor lending practices.  In the U.K. today, the government actually took over control of one of these lenders rather than see them fail.  Will the redistribution of wealth and government controls be the solution?  Of course not, but in the U.S. our politicians practically fell over themselves, Democrat and Republican, to vote in favor of this solution.  The presumed Republican presidential nominee, John McCain made sure he was there to vote in the affirmative.  Where is the political courage in that?  Where is the “maverick” when you need him?

John McCain knows that a vote against the Stimulus Package would mean almost certain defeat in the fall election, as the American people would not look favorable on this.  This is the case because most people do not understand the true root cause of the current problem.  Politicians would be better off explaining the cause (that is, if they know what it is themselves) rather than offering people taxpayer money as a quick fix or as President Bush called it, “a booster shot.”  Rather than a booster shot, America needs a reality shot!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Politics of Hope and Age

I have no problem with Barak Obama as a human being.  He seems likable enough.  Very popular among Democrat voters, women are even fainting in his presence.  Some are comparing it to the Kennedy "mystique."

But Democrats would be wise to think about that comparison before jumping to that conclusion.  After all, those who saw the Kennedy Nixon debates gave the edge to John F. Kennedy.  Those would heard the debates on the radio gave the edge to Richard Nixon.  The conclusion most would draw from this is that Kennedy lacked the substance of Richard Nixon.

This is an interesting thing to think about considering there are many concerns about Barak Obama's substance.  Many people backing Obama have no idea what he stands for policy-wise.  Their support is based on the likeability factor, the same likeability factor that elected Kennedy and Clinton.

If there is one thing for certain, it is that a good percentage of the American people are driven to vote, not based on substance, but based on an individual's "likeability."  Frankly this trait by many of our fellow Americans disgusts me.  That we can be so shallow is embarrassing.  

This trait is almost as bad as America's memory loss problem.  It seemed we were united for a while after 911 but then a couple of years later a good percentage of Americans seem to forget what had happened just a few years earlier.  Americans even forgot that a majority of us had supported going to war with Iraq before we actually invaded.

If there is any hope for John McCain in the fall election, it is that he is a man of substance, we may not agree with everything he stands for but at least we know where he stands.  The key for the republicans will be to convey this substance so that it drowns out the personal appeal of Barak Obama.

God forbid we have a repeat of 1960, or 1996 for that matter.  Bob Dole may have beaten Bill Clinton if he were 20 years younger.  During that campaign he was seen as old, even falling of the stage at one point during the campaign and referring to the Los Angeles Dodgers as the "Brooklyn Dodgers."

The Democrats will use John McCain’s age against him, how his campaign responds may hold the key to victory for Republicans in November.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran Still A Threat

The Bush Administration’s policy in dealing with Iran is exactly the right policy.  The incessant attempt by the rest of the world to avoid war with Iran by pandering to them is only a result of the intelligence failure that led us to war with Iraq.  Many nations and politicians resist every attempt to pressure Iran into becoming open and compliant with their nuclear policies.

The latest National Intelligence Report was worded in such a way as to give the world a false sense of security.  But the truth in that report is hidden by the facts. The report acknowledges that Iran had a secret nuclear weapons policy into 2003 but that program was dropped when the U.S. went to war with Iraq for fear that they were next.  What is less certain, as the report declares, is whether or not that program has been restarted.

The truth about Iran is hidden by what the world wants to believe.  Iran now claims to pursue a “peaceful” nuclear policy for energy.  But the truth is that Iran has abundant energy options including oil and natural gas, and the “need” for nuclear power is far from convincing.

The behavior of the Iranian government is hidden in a veil of secrecy that is not clear at all to the rest of the world.  And that is the point, isn’t it?  The utmost pressure should be placed on Iran until it becomes open and honest with the rest of the world as to the intent and progress of its nuclear programs.  Until that time it is entirely appropriate for the U.S. and the other members of the U.N. Security Council to vote on and install additional sanctions until they are convinced Iran is acting peacefully and becomes totally open to inspections by the IAEA (the International Atomic Energy Agency).

The other option would be to believe the words of Iranian regime and hope that the world is not in danger from an aggressive Iran.  The closer you are geographically to Iran, the more you need to concerned.  If you are Israel, one of our closest allies, the danger is substantial.  Especially considering this is the same Iran and same leader who has threatened to wipe you off the face of the earth.

If you wait, how long do you wait?  Waiting until there is proof of a nuclear weapon is too long as by then it will be too late.  Intense pressure on Iran must be put into place immediately, for the sake of world peace and safety.  For all we know, and what we don’t know, it may already be too late.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Conservative Movement Lives On

Regardless of what happens with the outcome of the Republican nomination process, the Conservative movement will live on.  Conservatism is not based in a political party, and certainly not the Republican Party.  The movement is not based in any one candidate or person; it is not even based in the figure of Ronald Reagan, conservative as he was.

No, conservatism is a state of mind in the lives of those that subscribe to it.  It is the inherent belief that big government is a waste and that government exists only to the extent that IT can serve the people.  Conservatives don't want government to solve our problems; we know that we must solve our problems ourselves.  We don't need John McCain and campaign finance reform to tell us how much money we can spend on campaigns and when we can give and when is too close to the election that we can no longer advocate our positions.

No, conservatism insists that people take personal responsibility for their lives and that we solve our own problems as a community.  Conservatism believes in a strong military and a strong deterrent defense.  We believe in peace through strength, not pandering to those in the world we disagree with.

No matter what happens this year, conservatives will still be conservatives no matter whom we vote for, or who becomes the next president.  We'll be there to point out the good and bad in any administration, and we will only support those who truly support "life, liberty and the [independent] pursuit of happiness."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »